So, a lot of the articles we've read I've disagreed with, for example the phallus-filled article by Roberta Trite about the innuendo of the Little Mermaid. I don't, however, have much to disagree with regarding this most recent article "Timon and Pumbaa's Alternative Lifestyle Dilemma," by Gael Sweeney. I never registered Timon and Pumbaa as a gay couple, maybe because I was four or so when I first watched the Lion King, until reading Sweeney's article. After reading the article and comparing it to my most recent memories of the Lion King, I could not only see Timon and Pumbaa as a gay couple but they seemed almost akin to Cam and Mitchell from Modern Family (maybe their relationship was an earlier inspiration? -- might be a stretch). While I'd never really considered their relationship to be romantic, their bickering, general relations with one another, and the way they tended to an adopted "child" (Simba) really did remind me of a more familial relationship than just pals kickin' it.
Granted some of her points weren't as strong. Personally I didn't think that Timon calling Pumbaa his "bestest best friend" indicated a gay relationship -- the terminology was too child-like or infantile so instead it reminded me of the way two kindergarteners would refer to a close friend. Similarly, I don't think the hula-dancing scene codes the two as a gay couple because I think it's just a colorful, whimsical dance scene more than anything. Children love bright colors, music, and dancing and we have to keep in mind that Disney is producing movies mostly for children. While there are luau-themed drag shows, I doubt that this is one of them. In fact most of their songs are really more friendship-inspired than insinuating romance.
The reason I still see them as possibly a romantic couple is because a relationship isn't purely sexual or lovey-dovey. When a relationship gets to the point where a couple is ready to raise a child (Simba), the two people are friends as well as romantic partners. They can have moments of being friends that are entirely platonic because Timon and Pumbaa have been together for a long time and so are no longer in the "lovey-dovey" stage that Simba and Nala are when you see the next instance of romantic love in the movie. Mufasa and Sarabi aren't particularly romantic-seeming when you see them as a couple at the beginning of their movie (literally no other couple in the movie is as traditionally couple-y as Simba and Nala). The most convincing evidence of Timon and Pumbaa as a romantic couple is the fact that they raise a child together. They teach Simba how to behave, what's right and wrong, and how to live life after he is totally isolated from his pride.
Also, the fact that Nathan Lane SAID that he tried to portray Timon as a gay, Jewish man means it's probable that Timon could be read as a gay man (and should be). They could be just another set of friends, but also the fact that neither Timon nor Pumbaa ever end up with their respective female meercat and warthog could support the assumption that they're a gay couple.
Personally, I support it and I really hope that Disney included a same-sex couple in their movie even as early as 1994. It'd mean they were super progressive even that far back in Distory. I'd be proud of Disney and proud that Disney's first introduction of a same-sex couple is as a couple that raises not only a successful child, but one who later becomes a successful King with a strong moral compass and a way with the ladies. It would show how even Disney, generally a fairly conservative company, believes that same-sex couples can behave in a way people tend to view as "normal" (not exclusively a hyper-flamboyant way) and can raise a happy, healthy child that doesn't necessarily conform to the same sexuality. I will choose to believe Sweeney's viewpoint and I hope it becomes a more broadly accepted comprehension of the Lion King.
No comments:
Post a Comment